Choose the Right Word
Flaubert’s observation is true in creative writing, journalism, scholarly works and many other forms of writing but in none is the consequence of choosing words incorrectly more costly than in legal practice. In all practice areas, lawyers are charged with the responsibility of choosing the right word to express the intended meaning accurately and unambiguously. Seldom are lawyers granted the luxury of time to go in search of perfection, but an amazingly efficient resource is available right at our fingertips!
Lexicographer Samuel Johnson labeled himself a “harmless drudge” but lexicographers unintentionally wield great power and authority over the practice of law. Every day, million dollar cases are decided and prison sentences handed down based on definitions of words recorded in a dictionary. It makes sense then to study the lexicographer’s work product carefully. In the quest for the perfect word, a good dictionary is the obvious starting point.
A good dictionary lists synonyms and antonyms for many words, often with educational comments for distinguishing various shades of meaning. For example, under the word “improve,” the American Heritage Dictionary lists the following synonyms: better, make better, help, ameliorate, enhance, perfect, enrich, and upgrade. The entry also points out that “improve” refers to an act of raising in quality or of relieving an undesirable situation; “better” implies worldly gain; “help” implies limited relief or change for the better; “ameliorate”refers to improving or bettering conditions that cry out for change; “enhance”suggests adding to something already attractive and thus increasing its value; and “perfect” suggests bringing to excellence. Use of the information available in a good dictionary will improve, help, ameliorate, enhance, or perfect your writing, as the case may be!
Hazards of language can also be found in a good dictionary. For example, the American Heritage Dictionary points out that use of the word “contemporary” requires careful attention due to potential confusion over what period is intended as contemporary. Absent any other reference to time,“contemporary” is considered to be the period in which the author or speaker lives, but the context may imply that a different period was intended. This information alerts the astute legal writer to the potential ambiguity created by using the word “contemporary” and also provides helpful suggestions for avoiding it.
Dictionaries provide information to assist in distinguishing between two words where usage is close. For example, The American Heritage Dictionary explains the distinction between “in” and “into”: Inprimarily indicates position, location, or condition. She was in the room. He was in pain. Intoindicates direction or movement to an interior location or, figuratively, change of condition. She went into the room. He went into bliss.
Dictionaries often fall into the category of pleasure reading for Mensa candidates and should be read more thoroughly and regularly by those of us whose livelihoods depend on dexterous and effective use of our language. Although dictionary entries are usually brief, they compress an amazing reservoir of information including the following:
· Spelling and acceptable variations on spelling;
· Syllabication;
· Pronunciation;
· Definitions;
· Words having identical meaning (e.g., “mountain lion,” “catamount,” “cougar,” “mountain cat,” “panther,” and “puma”);
· Tenses of regular and irregular verbs, including past tense, past participle, present participle, and third person singular present tense;
· Comparative and superlative degrees of adjectives and adverbs;
· Plurals of nouns, especially irregular and questionable nouns;
· Parts of speech;
· Nonstandard, informal, slang, or vulgar usage;
· Synonyms and shades of meaning of similar words;
· Usage notes and Usage Panel polling results on acceptable usage for questionable expressions; and
· Etymology.
No comments:
Post a Comment